CARTA ABERTA AO JORNALISTA MARIO VITOR RODRIGUES, DA REVISTA ISTO É

CARTA ABERTA AO JORNALISTA MARIO VITOR RODRIGUES, DA REVISTA ISTO É

capra
Sr. jornalista
Tive o desprazer de conhecê-lo hoje, graças à sua matéria, escrita na revista Isto É, uma das muitas porta-vozes da classe dominante, do golpe, da entrega do país no balcão de negócios multinacionais.

Já o respondi, na própria revista, e gostaria muito que me replicasse, para que iniciássemos um debate.

Pela ilustração feita do seu rosto, o Sr. é bem novo, provavelmente com idade de quase ser meu neto, o que me faz ver no incitamento ao assassinato de Lula um arroubo juvenil de quem não teria coragem de fazê-lo pessoalmente.

Não levei muito a sério tal disparate, preocupando-me muito mais o tipo de gente que o Sr. é, já que com a personalidade preferencial dos patrões da mídia, na hora da contratação.

É muito fácil ser valentão quando se está do lado do mais forte, ombreado com os três poderes e a mídia (quarto poder), com o aparelho de repressão do Estado.
Corajosos foram os que ousaram na Ditadura Militar, os de agora são heróis de aluguel, dublês de personagens dos mangás japoneses.

O que me conforta, diante de homens como o Sr. é que têm dias contados, já que, como toda mercadoria, são perecíveis, têm vida útil curta, graças à manipulação continuada dos seus proprietários.

Esta semana tivemos um bom exemplo do fim que levam os da sua verve, a dos locadores da própria consciência, redigindo o que o patrão quer, independente de conseqüências.

William Waack, segundo a Wikileaks, um ex importante e perigoso informante da Cia, foi para o ninho dos seus afins, para a Globo, como poderia ter ido para a Veja ou a Isto é, passando à verborragia em defesa da quadrilha que está no poder e dos interesses multinacionais aqui neste sofrido país de mercenários escribas, padrão Waacks, como o Sr. mesmo.

Frequentou a mansão dos Marinhos, teve livre trânsito na empresa e se acreditou todo poderoso, acima do bem e do mal, coisa típica dos covardes que se sentem blindados, e caiu.

Está afastado e deverá ser demitido.

O poder, a luz dos holofotes, o estrelato são fugazes porque o controle remoto está sempre nas mãos dos patrões com um dedinho no delet, pronto para descartar a laranja já chupada, tornada desidratado bagaço.

Isto é o que penso do Sr. enquanto jornalista, um menino deslumbrado com o poder que um teclado lhe dá, com o mesmo deslumbramento que uma AR-15 dá aos meninos da sua idade e caráter, nos morros cariocas, com a ressalva de que eles se expõem, enquanto o Sr.... Redige e passa no caixa.

Certamente o Sr. tem pai e, provavelmente, pela idade, avô, aos quais o Sr. deve devotar sentimentos bons, fazendo-os queridos seus.

Qual seria a sua reação, se um celerado sem princípios incitasse a que os matassem?

O alvo da sua cretinice é pai e avô, e tem um caráter diametralmente oposto ao seu, já que criticado até pela própria esquerda, por ser afável, respeitoso e cordial, longe, muito longe de tentar se acumpliciar com um homicida, por indução.

Gostaria muito de ver a sua coragem como jornalista, se cobrasse a propriedade de meia tonelada de cocaína no helicóptero de um senador; mais de seiscentos quilos de cocaína em jatinho que levantou vôo da fazenda de um ministro; se investigasse as malas de Temer ou a morte de Teori... Mas nadar contra a maré é para os fortes, está muito além da sua capacidade profissional e pessoal, de reles locador dos dedos, para digitar o do agrado dos seus donos.

Fico por aqui, alertando que mandarei cópia desta carta para a revista onde o Sr. loca a sua consciência, trabalhando desequilibrados, criminosos em potencial, para que façam o trabalho que os covardes não ousam fazer, limitados a coadjuvância do patronato, até se perceberem um puxa saco sem saco para puxar, porque desempregado.

Em tempo: Lula está liderando as pesquisas de intenção de votos em todas as situações, seja quem for o dono do saco que o senhor puxará mais adiante, e imagino, pelo porte da revista, que por um preço baratinho, baratinho.

Francisco Costa
Rio, 11/11/2017.

ESTADOS UNIDOS NÃO DIVULGAM TODOS OS DOCUMENTOS SOBRE MORTE DE KENNEDY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A misteriosa ligação recebida por um jornal inglês 25 minutos antes do assassinato de Kennedy
Documentos recém-divulgados citam telefonema ao Cambridge News para falar de 'grande notícia nos EUA'.
 
Por BBC - https://g1.globo.com/mundo/noticia/a-misteriosa-ligacao-recebida-por-um-jornal-ingles-25-minutos-antes-do-assassinato-de-kennedy.ghtml

27 out. / 2017 - Às 18h05 (horário local) de 22 de novembro de 1963, o jornal regional britânico Cambridge News recebia um misterioso telefonema. A chamada, anônima, apenas se referia a "uma grande notícia nos Estados Unidos".

Vinte e cinco minutos depois, o presidente americano John F. Kennedy era alvejado em Dallas, no Texas. O 35º presidente dos Estados Unidos foi morto a tiros enquanto desfilava com a primeira-dama Jacqueline Kennedy em uma limusine aberta. O caso alimenta teorias da conspiração até hoje.

O telefonema britânico foi registrado em um memorando em 26 de novembro daquele ano, tornado público pelos Arquivos Nacionais dos EUA em julho, mas passou despercebido. Agora, volta a ser revelado com uma leva de documentos relacionados ao assassinato e sua investigação, que perderam o status de confidencialidade nesta quinta-feira.

O memorando, escrito pelo vice-diretor do FBI James Angleton ao então chefe da agência, J. Edgar Hoover, informava que o serviço de inteligência britânico MI5 havia apurado que o misterioso telefonema fora feito a um repórter sênior do jornal de Cambridge.

"O autor da ligação disse apenas que o repórter do Cambridge News deveria telefonar à Embaixada dos EUA em Londres para uma grande notícia e então desligou", dizia o memorando.

"Após saber da morte do presidente, o repórter informou a polícia de Cambridge do telefonema anônimo e a polícia informou o MI5. A questão importante é que a ligação foi feita, segundo os cálculos do MI5, cerca de 25 minutos antes de o presidente ter sido alvejado. O repórter nunca havia recebido uma ligação desse tipo antes, e o MI5 afirma que ele [jornalista] é conhecido deles como uma pessoa sensata e leal, sem nenhum histórico [de problemas] de segurança."

O memorando acrescentou que telefonemas anônimos similares "de uma natureza estranhamente coincidente" haviam sido recebidos por pessoas no Reino Unido ao longo do ano anterior, "particularmente em conexão com o caso de Dr. Ward" - uma aparente referência ao médico Stephen Ward, personagem central do escândalo político britânico chamado Caso Profumo, que abalou o governo conservador no início dos anos 1960.

 

A atual equipe do Cambridge News diz desconhecer a identidade do repórter que recebeu o telefonema, mas vai localizar antigos repórteres dos anos 1960 para tentar descobrir.
"É [uma história] de cair o queixo", afirma a repórter Anna Savva. "Não temos nada a respeito em nosso arquivo, e ninguém [na redação do Cambridge News] sabe o nome da pessoa que recebeu o telefonema."

Em um vídeo postado no site do jornal, o chefe de reportagem Chris Elliott diz que a incógnita inicialmente veio à tona nos anos 1980.

"Um advogado de Londres, Michael Eddowes, começou a investigar um documento que supostamente conseguiu na CIA [agência de inteligência dos EUA]", disse.

"Nesse documento, mencionava-se um telefonema feito ao Cambridge News advertindo que algo grande ia acontecer. [...] Não sabemos se o telefonema de fato foi feito, não sabemos qual repórter recebeu o telefonema e não sabemos qual seria a razão para alguém telefonar para um jornal de Cambridge a respeito disso."

Elliott disse que o advogado Eddowes, que morreu em 1992, "estava convencido de que havia algum tipo de conspiração" e que o telefonema pode ter sido um entre vários feitos a jornais e outros veículos de imprensa para tentar fomentar a ideia de que a morte de Kennedy fora orquestrada.


EUA não divulgam todos os documentos sobre morte de JFK

Casa Branca vai liberar quase 3 mil documentos, mas perto de 200 vão continuar sob segredo por, pelo menos, seis meses.

http://g1.globo.com/jornal-nacional/noticia/2017/10/eua-nao-divulgam-todos-os-documentos-sobre-morte-de-jfk.html

26 out. / 2017 - O governo americano frustrou, nesta quinta-feira (26), quem esperava a divulgação total de documentos sobre o assassinato do ex-presidente dos Estados Unidos John Kennedy.
A Casa Branca explicou que vai liberar quase três mil documentos sobre a morte do presidente John Kennedy, mas perto de 200 vão continuar sob segredo por, pelo menos, seis meses.

No fim de semana, o presidente Donald Trump afirmou que iria permitir a divulgação dos documentos, mas a Casa Branca disse, na noite desta quinta-feira (26), que muitos deles contêm informações que, mesmo décadas depois, ainda precisam ser protegidas. Por exemplo, a identidade de informantes e dados sobre parceiros dos Estados Unidos. Trump quer que as agências de inteligência revisem os documentos que continuam confidenciais para, quem sabe, divulgá-los em breve.

Os papéis podem tirar dúvidas sobre o crime que ainda alimenta teorias de conspiração. Em 1963, John Kennedy foi assassinado com um tiro na cabeça durante uma carreata em Dallas, no Texas. Lee Harvey Oswald foi preso, acusado de atirar com um fuzil da janela de um prédio. Mas, dois dias depois, ele foi assassinado por um homem que se dizia revoltado com a morte de Kennedy.
A investigação concluiu que Oswald cometeu o crime sozinho. Uma lei federal de 1992 deu prazo de 25 anos para que todos os documentos sobre o caso fossem divulgados. Esse prazo acaba nesta quinta-feira.

A imensa maioria dos papéis sobre a morte de Kennedy já foi liberada nas últimas décadas, mas muitos americanos ainda acham que a morte dele foi resultado de uma conspiração. Os Estados Unidos estavam em plena Guerra Fria e o atirador tinha simpatia pelo comunismo. Além disso, existem dúvidas sobre a atuação da inteligência americana que, talvez, poderia ter evitado a morte de Kennedy.


Secret JFK files reveal "high-priced Hollywood call girl" questioned about 'sex parties with John Kennedy, Frank Sinatra and Sammy Davis Jr'
The revelation came out in one of the 2,800 JFK files released this week

Fonte: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/secret-jfk-files-reveal-high-11417480
por: Rachael Burford

27 out./ 2017 - A 'high-class Hollywood call girl' was questioned about her involvement in 'sex parties' with John F. Kennedy, Frank Sinatra and Sammy Davis Jr, the secret JFK files have revealed.

An FBI document states that the escort, named as Sue Young, was contacted by Los Angeles private detective Fred Otash, who was “convicted of horse race fixing.”


She told FBI agents in Los Angeles that Otash had asked about her “participation in sex parties” with John Kennedy, his brother-in-law Peter Lawford, Frank Sinatra, and Sammy Davis Jr.

According to the document, Young said she had told Otash that she had "no knowledge of such activities" but he then asked her to name "any girls that might have been present" at the parties.

memorando
The memo refers to a high class call girl (Image: EPA-EFE/REX/Shut​terstock)

The file, dated July 26, 1960, states that Otash wanted Young to set up a meeting with senator Kennedy and equip her with a recording device for taking down any "indiscreet statements".

Otash later implied that a magazine was “looking for dirt on Kennedy or Lawford” that it could use before the November, 1960 election.


Sue Young said she had no knowledge of sex parties with Frank Sinatra and JFK


Kennedy was a renowned womanizer, much to the despair of his wife Jackie.

Another released memo, sent to then-Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy and the FBI director, warned about a book that would detail a romance between JFK and Hollywood star Marylin Monroe.

The book was by Frank A Capell and entitled The Strange Death of Marilyn Monroe, it said.
"The New York Office has now furnished us with a copy of this 70-page book," it stated.

"The book claims that Miss Monroe’s involvement with Kennedy 'was well known to her friends and reporters in the Hollywood area'.

"It is alleged that 'there are person-to-person telephone calls, living witnesses, tape recordings and certain writings to attest the closeness of their friendship'."

 

TIM SCULLY THE INVENTOR OF LSD' S ORANGE

orange
Sarah Sloat / https://www.inverse.com/article/26849-tim-scully-lsd-orange-sunshine-documentary-documenta

26 jan. / 2017 - In 1970, a cargo plane flew over 25,000 people at a rock concert and dropped thousands of acid tabs to the cheering crowd below. The packets contained a strain of LSD nicknamed “Orange Sunshine,” considered today the most iconic and purest form of acid.

With the help of the Brotherhood of Eternal Love, an organization that dubbed themselves as “the Johnny Appleseeds of hallucinogenics,” Orange Sunshine spread throughout the world.


Orange Sunshine became ubiquitous thanks primarily to psychedelic evangelist Tim Scully, who spent hours in the lab creating the drug at the heart of the 1960s counter-culture movement. His story is told in the new documentary The Sunshine Makers, which is set for wide release on January 27. Inverse recently spoke with Scully about his experience, the future of LSD, and how he no longer thinks acid can turn on the entire world.

How did you get introduced to LSD?

The reason I took LSD in the first place is because a childhood friend of mine (who was studying oriental philosophy while I was studying math-physics) turned me onto Aldous Huxley’s writing. That got me really interested in mystical experiences and particularly chemically induced transcendental experiences. That got me interested enough to find someone selling LSD and buy a couple of doses so that my friend Don and I could take it together. Up until that point I had been studying math and physics and was on the narrow path to becoming a government researcher in physics.

In what ways did LSD affect the way you saw the world?

Taking LSD for the first time was like getting struck by lightning, it completely redirected my life. I wasn’t raised with a strong religious background — my parents were English Protestant and Irish Catholic — and that basically averaged out to nothing. The experience I had for the first time I took acid was transcendental and it was a feeling of oneness with everything and everyone. The thought that came to me was, “If everyone could experience this we will be in a much better place.” At the time, the Vietnam War was roaring along, environmental degradation was an issue, there were a lot of inequality issues, and it was obvious that there was all kinds of inequality — racial, sexual, you name it. I believed very easily that if everybody took LSD a lot of that would go away: People would feel open and connected with each other, and feel compassion for each other and for the planet.

orange 2

Tim Scully at McNeil Island Prison.
 
And this led to you making acid?

That’s why I started doing it. In April 1965, Don and I set out to make a lot of acid. I eventually hooked up with Owsley Stanley, became his apprentice, learned how to make LSD, and we went on to make a lot of it. For the five years that I was doing it, I was really convinced that we were doing something that might save the world. But as the years went by, it became slowly — little by little — harder to believe that LSD could save the world.

Why did you change your opinion that acid could change the world?

At first, it seemed really cool. In 1966 and 1967, things were going very well. But by 1968 to 1970, the scene got darker and darker. There were more people taking bad drugs, more people behaving badly. People like Charles Manson who were taking acid, going out, and murdering people. We couldn’t control who took it. It became really clear that I had a pretty naive view of what scattering LSD to the four winds would do.

I still believed then, and I still believe now, that it has a lot of potential for doing a lot of good. But I was no longer convinced that just making a lot of LSD available was suddenly going to cause everybody to have the same kind of experience I did. And even if they did, after a number of years I realized that a lot of my friends who had the similar experiences were still behaving badly in a lot of ways. I thought taking acid was going to end hypocrisy and dishonesty. But I started being more and more aware of funky behavior. So the benefits of making LSD in my mind had decreased significantly.

Could you describe the feeling in the lab in the early days when you started making acid?

It was really exciting. It was 1966 and we thought we were doing something that was going to change the world in a really positive way. We were watching what was going on in the scene and the stuff that was happening seemed really cool — there was beautiful art and music and people were smiling. They had a happy gleam in their eyes.

My second lab in Denver was the one that got busted [by federal agents] while I was off getting materials and equipment. That felt really scary and they eventually caught up with me and had to go to court proceedings for that, looking at possibly 56 years in jail. Fortunately, that turned out to be an illegal search.


So that takes us to Windsor [in California], where we made Orange Sunshine. That was exciting; it was the largest scale lab I ever worked in. We made over a kilo of LSD — that’s more than 4 million doses. We thought that it would produce really good social changes and had a lot of hope about that and went to distribute it. We talked with the Brotherhood of Eternal Love about the idea that we needed to turn the whole world on. With them we got it all over the world. In 1970, I bailed out — i.e. quit. The Brotherhood kept going, [but] I quit because the risk-benefit ratio was out of whack.

In regard to how I felt physiologically — I got high in the lab, but because you get high all the time you build up a tolerance very rapidly. You’re still altered but it’s a very different kind of high. You don’t even realize that you’re altered unless you talk with someone who isn’t stoned, then you realize that you really are stoned. But it’s more like micro-dosing. Which we didn’t know about in those days. We were mega-dosing.

If you’re going to take a psychedelic I believe it’s better to do it in a calm, quiet setting. I like to do it in nature or sitting in front of a fireplace with one or two friends and a guide. I don’t recommend at a partying and rock and roll dance. I think that’s fun for some people, but not for me.

orange 3

A scene from the film The Sunshine Makers.

What happened when you realized that LSD wasn’t creating the change you wanted to see?

Well, at the same time over the years, I’d gotten hotter and hotter. I set up a lab on my own and got followed by Feds. I knew that they knew. But I had a reason, I was doing something important. And at first it was pretty easy to lose the Feds. However, by 1970, they got better than I was and there came a time when I wasn’t able to lose them and I had to abandon what I was doing at the time. Right after that I had a lab accident where I got really stoned and I had a very bad trip and thought the Feds were in the trees outside. And I thought, “I’m done.” I hoped that somebody would keep doing it — but I couldn’t keep doing it.

I turned to making biofeedback instruments because I was very interested in altering consciousness, biofeedback, and self-control. I did that for a number of years but then my karma caught up with me. The statute of limitations was close to running out when I finally got indicted. My friend Nick, who I taught how to make acid, didn’t stop when I did; he kept doing it and he became a part of a really big investigation.

I got convicted and sent to prison for a 20-year sentence; Nick got 15 years. I got 20 years because I testified for the defense and that really made the judge mad — he really didn’t like my attitude. I understand, he was trying to protect society. We went to prison. The judge set our appeal bond and it was really high: half a million dollars cash. We got that reduced on appeal and I got out on bail. I went back and made more biofeedback instruments. Nick eventually jumped bail, set up a lab, and made more acid in labs all over the world. He had a lab in Canada where the RCMP made a film that was included in the movie.

There’s an increasing amount of research that suggests that LSD could be developed as a clinical drug to alleviate anxiety and addiction. How does it feel for you to see this transition of LSD from vilified substance to something that is now being taken more seriously in the medical community?

I’m really glad to see that legitimate research is coming back. One of my many regrets is that the work we did shut down research for so many years. I’m thrilled to see that the research is moving ahead and I hope it accelerates. I think that there are many legitimate medical uses for psychedelics and I hope there is something developed for healthy people to be able to use psychedelics under whatever supervision might be required for it to be done legitimately. Under the supervision of a licensed therapist or whatever the government might require.

There is a lot that healthy people could do with psychedelics if done responsibly. But looking at what could be done with people who have medical issues is really big. Death and dying is important, all other applications are very valuable. There is a lot of evidence that it had powerful medical applications back in the 1950s and early 1960s but it unfortunately got derailed.

How does it feel to see your life history play out in the film?

I’m glad that the film makes our story accessible to everyone, so they can have some sense of what we were up to. We were trying to do something good — it may not have worked out, but we had good intentions.

This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity.

Photos via Tim Scully/FilmRise, FilmRise, Giphy

Here’s how underground chemist Tim Scully planned to save the world with LSD
He managed to get acid behind the Iron Curtain
by Angela Chen@chengela / http://www.theverge.com/2017/1/26/14398934/tim-scully-lsd-chemistry-drugs-counterculture-psychedelics

orange 2

Tim Scully, subject of Cosmo Feilding Mellen’s THE SUNSHINE MAKERS, pictured here at the McNeil Island Prison.
Courtesy of FilmRise

26 Jan. / 2017 - Tim Scully was 20 when he did LSD for the first time, and the experience “was like getting struck by lightning.” It was 1965. Scully had been studying math and physics — on track to do government research — but acid changed everything. Instantly, he decided that his purpose was to make as much LSD as he could and give it away to anyone who wanted it, in order to “turn on the world.”

This quickly became illegal — and so Scully went on to become an underground LSD chemist. Along with fellow chemists Nick Sand and Owsley “Bear” Stanley, he spent years opening various labs, synthesizing raw materials to make millions of doses, and trying to avoid the Feds. He learned to produce Orange Sunshine, some of the purest LSD ever made — 99.99 percent pure. The popular substance was once considered the standard for quality LSD, and even mentioned in an SNL skit.

Two different labs were busted, and Scully ended up receiving a 20-year prison sentence, of which he served three years. Scully, who now works in electronic design, is the subject of the documentary Sunshine Makers, directed by Cosmo Feilding Mellen. Ahead of the documentary’s release this week, The Verge interviewed Scully about how he learned to make LSD, what made the work worth it, and what made him turn away from the drugs.

This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity.

Tell me about the first time you took LSD. How did you go from one trip to deciding that LSD was going to save the world?

Taking LSD redirected my life within a matter of a couple of hours. I was going to go into government-supported research, that's what my father wanted for me and my brother. My brother followed the script, but after taking LSD I immediately decided that the most important thing I could do with my life, the thing that would help other people the most, would be to try to share this experience.

If I’d been successful, we would’ve been able to make approximately 200 kilos of LSD, about 750 million doses, and given them away to anyone who wanted to take it, for free. We thought that if people took LSD, they would see through hypocrisy and dishonesty. They’d be gentler with each other because they would have felt at one with each other, gentler with environment because they’d feel at one with the environment. Those beliefs were all somewhat naive. In the end it didn’t turn out quite like that, but that’s what we wanted.

What happened next? I know that you were an apprentice to Owsley “Bear” Stanley, the audio engineer who also synthesized a lot of acid. How did that happen?

For months after the first trip, I spent time in university library reading up on how to use raw material to synthesize LSD, initially from aboveground sources and then later from underground sources. So by the time I hooked up with Bear I had a rough idea from the published literature. What I learned eventually is that that’s just a drop in the bucket. Really, the information you need for making LSD is mostly lab technique and tricks of the trade. Lysergic acid compounds are very fragile, and they have to be handled with much more care than many chemists would believe. So someone who hasn’t had experience working with those compounds is likely to not have very high yields and not get very good purity.

I was interested in electronics work, and Bear originally did electronics work for the Grateful Dead while they traveled. So we had about six months of time that we spent taking LSD together at least once a week while I was doing that work. At the end of that time, when he’d completely run out of money and acid and wanted to set up a lab, he decided I’d passed the acid test and let me become his apprentice in the next lab.

What were some things they taught you, some “tricks of the trade”?

Bear was obsessed with purity and yield. The overwhelming majority of what he taught me was basically lab technique and how to handle lysergic acid. For example, you have to protect LSD from UV light because if LSD is exposed to UV light in the presence of moisture, moisture attaches and it becomes an undesirable compound, lumi-LSD, which would be a waste of the raw material.

So, the lab was lit with bug lights, incandescent lightbulbs with a coating on the inside so the light looks yellow. They’re sold because they don’t attract insects. We could easily buy those in a supermarket, so that was a good solution to protecting the LSD.

Another thing he taught me was that you can’t heat up lysergic acid compounds above room temperature unless it’s absolutely necessary, and if you do so, do it for the shortest possible time. They decompose all the time they’re heated up. So we used cold tap water as a heat source and that meant doing vacuum evaporation, which is a way of making the liquid evaporate at a lower temperature than normal. Bear designed vacuum evaporators and also designed a clever trap to catch any powder that might fly over with the vapor. He didn’t want any of the good stuff, any of the material, to get lost or wasted.

You were responsible for making Orange Sunshine. Why did this kind of LSD become so popular? Was it just the purity?

I do think part of what made Orange Sunshine very popular was that the Brotherhood of Eternal Love distributed it, and they were very sweet people who did a good job. They were nonviolent spiritual people. [Brotherhood founder] John Griggs had gone to [psychedelics advocate] Tim Leary and gotten advice that he should set [themselves] up as a religion to protect themselves legally.

He formed Brotherhood of Eternal Love as a religious organization and their purpose was to spread psychedelics. The Brotherhood guys started out in their youth as motorcycle gangsters, but they had held up a movie producer who had some LSD at gunpoint. They held him up, took his LSD, threw away their guns, and decided that they were going to be nonviolent LSD dealers. But they were having trouble getting as much as they wanted to distribute, so when I came and said, “I’d like you to distribute the LSD I make,” they were very happy.

When I was working with Bear, he and I took an acid trip with Richard Alpert one day in 1967 where we were planning the strategy of turning on the world, modest as we were, and one of the things we agreed on was that if we just turned on the United States it would be like unilateral disarmament. We really had to make sure that every country in the world got turned on, particularly those behind the Iron Curtain, or else it would be a very bad thing geopolitically. And so we talked to the Brotherhood and they made an effort to spread it around the world. And they did get our LSD into Vietnam and behind the Iron Curtain and all over.

You worked in four labs total, two of them in Denver. The second Denver lab was busted. What happened there?

The second Denver lab was busted when I was out of town getting equipment and materials. It was a comedy of errors. I lost all my lab equipment, though fortunately I had my raw material because it wasn’t in the lab. I had all this raw material and no money because I had spent it bailing assistants out of jail and getting money to pay their legal fees. I needed to get lab equipment and a place to cook. That’s where I ended up hooking up with Nick [Sand] because he had the money and agreed to fund the final lab, the Windsor lab in California.

Despite being busted, you went on to set up the Windsor lab. What made you so devoted?

We always knew it wasn’t going to end well and we knew that the Feds usually get their men in the end. From the beginning, lysergic acid — the raw material to make LSD — was already hard to get, and we believed that governments would be opposed to this. One of the things that taking LSD made both of us feel very strongly — and made a lot of people feel strongly [about] — is a deep skepticism of large corporations and governments. And from December 1966 on, every time I went home I was followed by federal agents and I had to lose them before I went anywhere important.

We thought saving the world was worth the risk, and if we ended up spending a bunch of time in prison, it’d be the price we’d have to pay for having done this community service. We knew they were closing in on us when we were setting up that Windsor lab, it wasn’t like we didn’t know that bad things were likely to happen.

Unlike Nick and Bear, you eventually turned away from LSD. Why?

On a lot of levels, things happened that made me realize that just scattering more LSD to the four winds was not real likely to save the world. It was becoming a party drug — and I’m not saying that parties should be illegal or that it’s a bad thing, but I wouldn’t have chosen to go to prison for a long time so more people could have a party.

Fast forward to 1968, and more and more bad drugs were in [San Francisco’s] Haight. The scene looked darker and darker. Even though the Brotherhood wasn’t selling bad drugs, plenty of other dealers were. The government had chosen to put out propaganda saying that, “all drugs were equally bad, all equally awful, don’t ever touch any of them, they’ll all ruin your life.” People who took LSD or smoked pot, generally with opinion that these weren’t bad drugs, thought the government lied about one thing, so maybe they lied about everything. So they decided to try other drugs. And a lot of people who should have known better got into taking cocaine, opiates, amphetamines.

I had hoped that people who had this experience of oneness and empathy with everyone and everything would treat each other better afterwards, as a result of having felt that closeness. But it was becoming more and more clear that people in the scene who’d taken a lot of acid — even the people I was working with and making acid with — were not being honest with each other. There was still dishonesty and hypocrisy and double-dealing. My faith had decreased dramatically. It was time to stop.

What do you think of the recent resurgence in research around LSD and other psychedelics? What about microdosing, or taking tiny amounts of a psychedelic to manage mood?

I’m thrilled that research is starting up again. Eventually I would really like to see not only medical uses of LSD legalized, but also some mechanism by which people could use LSD for self-improvement with some kind of supervision.

Microdosing is even safer. Working in a lab you tend to get exposed to LSD all the time, so you build up a tolerance. The experience you have from just being exposed to fairly large doses is analogous to what you get from microdosing: an altered state, but a very benign altered state, no hallucinations. So yes, I’m glad to see all of those things.

 

PALMIRA NOVAMENTE VANDALIZADA

PUBLICIDADE
http://www.em.com.br/app/noticia/internacional/2017/01/20/interna_internacional,841245/grupo-estado-islamico-volta-a-vandalizar-cidade-siria-de-palmira.shtml
Grupo Estado Islâmico volta a vandalizar cidade síria de Palmira

AFP /Agence France-Presse


20 jan. / 2017 - Os extremistas do grupo Estado Islâmico (EI) confirmaram a triste fama de destruidores do patrimônio mundial, ao devastar e saquear tesouros da cidade antiga síria de Palmira, onde já tinha provocado estragos no ano passado.

Em outra frente da guerra na Síria, o grupo extremista rival, Fateh al-Sham (ex-Frente al Nusra, braço síria da Al Qaeda), foi alvo de bombardeios aéreos na província setentrional de Aleppo. Morreram pelo menos 40 de seus combatentes.

Mais de um mês depois de ter reconquistado Palmira das forças do regime de Bashar Al Assad, o EI promoveu novas destruições na cidade da província central de Homs, inscrita pela Unesco no patrimônio mundial da Humanidade.

"Fontes locais nos informaram que o Daesh (acrônimo em árabe do EI) destruiu o Tetrápilo, um monumento de 16 colunas, e fotografias por satélite recebidas (na quinta-feira) de nossos colegas da Universidade de Boston mostram danos na fachada do teatro romano", declarou à AFP Maamun Abdelkarim, diretor de Antiguidades.

O Tetrápilo foi construído na época de Diocleciano, no final do século III. Era um quadrado com quatro colunas em cada esquina. Das 16 colunas só havia uma da época, as outras foram reconstruídas com cimento pelo serviço de Antiguidades sírio em 1963. As originais eram de granito rosa procedente do Egito.

- Destroços e execuções -
O teatro romano conta com nove fileiras de arquibancadas. Data do século I depois de Cristo. Durante a primeira ocupação da cidade, de maio de 2015 a março de 2016, o EI o usou para as execuções públicas.

"Desde o primeiro dia, eu esperava o pior. Já fomos testemunhas do terror durante a primeira ocupação da cidade, e francamente não achava que Palmira fosse ser ocupada pela segunda vez", acrescentou Maamun.

"A batalha por Palmira é cultural e não política. Nunca entendi como é possível que a comunidade internacional e os atores do conflito sírio aceitassem que Palmira caísse", acrescentou.

A diretora-geral da Unesco, Irina Bokova, denunciou "um crime de guerra e uma perda imensa para o povo sírio e para a humanidade".

A Rússia classificou de "verdadeira tragédia" essas destruições, e lamentou que "os atos bárbaros continuem" em Palmira.

Em maio de 2015, o EI se apoderou pela primeira vez de Palmira, destruindo os mais belos templos da cidade milenar, o Arco do Triunfo, várias torres funerárias e o Leão de Palmira.

O grupo radical, responsável por atrocidades nas áreas que controla, executou 280 pessoas em Palmira, antes de ser expulso pelo exército sírio e seu aliado russo no fim de março de 2016.

No dia 11 de dezembro, os extremistas recuperaram Palmira, após uma grande ofensiva.

No deserto, nos arredores de Palmira, os combates continuam entre os radicais e as forças do regime. Há semanas o EI tenta avançar para o aeroporto de Tayfur para o acesso à estrada que une Palmira com a cidade de Homs.

 

O CALVÁRIO DE ALEPPO

ONU acusa governo e oposição de crimes de guerra em Aleppo
Bombardeios mataram civis e destruíram hospitais. Moradores foram usados como escudos humanos

POR REUTERS / http://oglobo.globo.com/mundo/onu-acusa-governo-oposicao-de-crimes-de-guerra-em-aleppo-20994704

01 mar. / 2017 - GENEBRA — Os dois lados da batalha pela cidade síria de Aleppo cometeram crimes de guerra, incluindo aeronaves do governo da Síria que bombardearam e alvejaram “deliberadamente” um comboio humanitário, matando 14 trabalhadores e interrompendo operações de ajuda, disseram investigadores da Organização das Nações Unidas (ONU) nesta quarta-feira.

Forças sírias e russas realizaram ataques aéreos diários contra o leste de Aleppo, então dominado por rebeldes, entre julho e sua queda desde dezembro, matando centenas de pessoas e destruindo hospitais, disseram os investigadores em seu relatório mais recente.

Bombas de fragmentação “foram usadas de forma generalizada” e lançadas do ar em áreas densamente povoadas, segundo o relatório, o que equivale ao crime de guerra de ataque indiscriminado.

Mas os investigadores não souberam dizer se tanto as forças sírias quanto as russas as utilizaram em Aleppo ou somente uma delas, nem atribuíram nenhum crime de guerra específico investigado às unidades russas.

“Durante o período em análise, os céus sobre a cidade de Aleppo e seus arredores foram controlados conjuntamente pelas Forças Aéreas síria e russa... (elas) usaram predominantemente as mesmas aeronaves e armas, com isso tornando a atribuição impossível em muitos casos”, disse o documento.

O relatório da Comissão de Inquérito da ONU — divulgado simultaneamente às conversas de paz da Síria em Genebra — cobre o período entre julho e dezembro e se baseia em 291 entrevistas com vítimas e testemunhas, além de análises de indícios forenses e imagens de satélite.

Helicópteros sírios lançaram bombas de gás cloro “no decorrer de 2016” em Aleppo, um arma proibida que causou centenas de baixas civis na cidade, relatou o documento. Ao menos cinco mil forças pró-governo também cercaram o leste de Aleppo para aplicar a tática “rendam-se ou passem fome”, de acordo com o relatório.

ESCUDOS HUMANOS

Do outro lado, grupos de oposição bombardearam o oeste de Aleppo, controlado por Damasco, matando e ferindo dezenas, disse o relatório. Eles impediram que os civis fugissem do leste da localidade, usando-os como “escudos humanos”, e atacaram o bairro residencial curdo de Sheikh Maqsoud, ambos crimes de guerra.

A coalizão liderada pelos Estados Unidos não realizou qualquer missão aérea ofensiva sobre Aleppo na segunda metade do ano, disseram.

Aviões de guerra sírios e russos lançaram munições sem sistema de rastreamento, conhecidas como “bombas burras”, ao invés de bombas inteligentes que possuem sensores eletrônicos para encontrar seus alvos, afirmou o relatório.

Os investigadores acusaram o governo sírio de um ataque aéreo “planejado meticulosamente e realizado cruelmente” contra um comboio da ONU e do Crescente Vermelho da Síria em Orum al-Kubra, no oeste rural de Aleppo, que matou 14 agentes humanitários em 19 de setembro.

Leia mais sobre esse assunto em http://oglobo.globo.com/mundo/onu-acusa-governo-oposicao-de-crimes-de-guerra-em-aleppo-20994704#ixzz4aAIu3G00
© 1996 - 2017. Todos direitos reservados a Infoglobo Comunicação e Participações S.A. Este material não pode ser publicado, transmitido por broadcast, reescrito ou redistribuído sem autorização.

aleppo3 (1)

O CALVÁRIO DE ALEPPO

por Hanan Amin Alkaram

colagem digital: Barbieri


Fale sobre Aleppo. Chore por eles como você chorou por Paris. Chore por eles como você chorou por Nova York. Fale sobre eles. Nosso silêncio está matando-os. São pessoas, PESSOAS. Eles não são importantes porque são árabes? Porque eles são sírios? Será que sua vida importa menos do que a vida de um francês ou um americano? Pessoas de Aleppo estão postando suas mensagens de despedida na internet como um massacre final sendo esperado para acontecer a qualquer momento em breve e estamos SILENCIOSOS. Ficamos em silêncio por mais de cinco anos. Algumas crianças em Aleppo não conhecem a vida sem guerra. Imagine viver em uma cidade de ruínas e ter que temer por sua vida a cada instante. Hospitais, igrejas, casas, restaurantes são bombardeados no cotidiano e centenas são mortos todos os dias. No entanto, estamos em silêncio. Lembre-se delas. Honre-os. Nós permitimos que um genocídio em massa acontecesse diante de nossos olhos por anos. A mídia fechou os olhos para isso. Este é um dos maiores genocídios desde o holocausto e o mundo está vendo as pessoas morrerem em silêncio. Não só morrendo mas também, sendo exterminados, retaliados e estuprados! Fale sobre Aleppo, por favor.


#prayforAleppo 

aleppo3 (2)

Articles View Hits
6321105

We have 1461 guests and no members online

Download Full Premium themes - Chech Here

София Дървен материал цени

Online bookmaker Romenia bet365.ro